: Garmin Nuvi 205 GPS System

: Garmin Nuvi 205 GPS System

could not open XML input

Garmin Nuvi 205 GPS System

from: Garmin



Garmin Nuvi 205 GPS System
Click Larger Image

More Info


Average Buyer Rating:  out of 5 stars
Sales Rank: 13435





Binding: Misc.
Product Brand: Garmin
Label: Garmin
Product Manufacturer: Garmin
Publisher: Garmin
Ranking: 13435
Studio: Garmin


Piece facts:
  • Unit Dimensions: W 3.8 in; H 2.8 in; D .8 in
  • Display Size: W 2.8 in; H 2.1 in
  • Display Resolution: 320 x 240 pixels
  • Display Type: QVGA color antiglare TFT with white backlight
  • Weight: 5.2 oz




System GPS 205 Nuvi Garmin






0ur opinion:

:
Portable and powerful, The Garmin® nüvi® 205 is your personal travel assistant for life on the go. This navigator leads the way with turn-by-turn directions and optional MSN® Direct services to get you there on time and keep you informed. lt's packed with millions of destinations and maps for the contiguous U.S., Canada, or regional sections of Europe.


Some more accessories for this product for you:
GARMIN 010-10268-00 Cigarette Lighter/PC Cable Adapter Uniden PC78XL 40 Channel CB Radio with Front Mic Garmin 64MB Memory Cartridge for Street Pilot or eMap Garmin GPS 152i with Internal Antenna Garmin Marine Mount for Garmin GPSMAP 76 click 4 more

Some more accessories for this product for you:












Testimonials
Average Buyer Rating:  out of 5 stars

Buyer's feedback: 5 out of 5 stars - * Excellent low end model ...
Real competition for the higher end Garmin products. S Rogers doesn't understand how to operate it. It is NOT advertised as text-to-speech. You CAN delete individual "favorites." The arrival times are aggressive, particularly if you live in LA - because this model cannot account for traffic. It's accuracy is superb, and it deletes the awkward antenna that made the old models incapable of pocket use. New pedestrian mode is also great.

The map is 2009, which doesn't keep up with all new retail.



Buyer's feedback: 3 out of 5 stars - Quite acceptable for a low-end item
I haven't used this item much as I just got it, but it has done everything and taken me wherever I told it to. Granted, I wouldn't always take the route designated, but you do have a choice of fastest or shortest and can make adjustments accordingly. We all have our shortcuts in areas that we travel often and they often won't show as options, but then, since you know them, why use a GPS?

I too wish you could delete just one item, and that it would tell you the street names, but for the amount of use I expect to put it through, which is probably minimal, it wasn't worth spending $$$ more for those bells and whistles.

I do like the Pedestrian capability, and will put that to a test tomorrow.



Buyer's feedback: 1 out of 5 stars - * Worse than useless, a turd in every sense of the word. ...
The 205 is less than useless. Here are a few reasons why.

1. It should provide accurate DISTANCE measurements. It doesn't. Over the several months I have owned this turd, I have loaded several dozen locations. When I click to view them, it will give me a specific distance. When I click one to actually go there, it then shows a distance which has differed by up to 60 miles or more. So "Mammoth Lakes" for example, is either 251 miles away, or (when I click to go there) perhaps 317. Heck, what's a 66 mile difference anyway? Whether the initial distance is an unreasonable and unusable measure like "as the crow flies" and the second one is using actual paved road, a unit this far off is worthless.

2. It should give reasonably useful driving DIRECTIONS. It doesn't. I have followed the directions completely, just to see what it does, and several times it has had me make 4-5 turns instead of simply continuing down the street I'm on to get on a freeway onramp 500 feet down the road I was originally on. Again, this is just stupid, wastes time and slows travel. Today, driving to a location 45 miles away, it kept telling me to exit the freeway when I was still 25 miles away, and to go in a southerly direction, when my destination was to the north. There is no way taking surface streets would get me there faster or even close to the same time. The programming is crappy.

3. It should not suddenly TURN OFF. It does. Just today, it switched off 3 times in a row. A unit that will not stay on is of no use. It wasn't the battery, or a case of hitting a wrong button. It just shut off 3 times.

4. It should give reasonably accurate estimated ARRIVAL TIME. It doesn't. I don't expect perfection, but I do expect a decent effort. This makes no effort. As best I can figure, it calculates the straight line distance (never mind that roads aren't built "as the crow flies"), ignores stop signs and red lights that would slow you down, etc. It also ignores all obvious traffic conditions people living in cities have to deal with, like traffic jams. In the mind of this system, there are no other cars on the road. If you ask the travel distance at midnight, it will give you the same (wrongly) estimated time as if you ask it "how long" at the height of rush hour. It assumes you're always going maximum speed and then some. It assumes a speed about 10-15 miles over the speed limit. I was driving to one destination and despite going 75 mph (in a 65 mph zone) most of the way, the estimate kept falling farther and farther back. After driving 10 minutes, the display told me it would take 6 minutes longer to arrive. The estimated arrival time changed by almost 48 minutes by the time I got there, meaning my "estimated travel time" almost doubled. What use is that? None. Since I bought it, I have never arrived anywhere near the starting time. It will display a time as you start, and that time keeps extending 1-2 minutes at a time, so that the final arrival time is never even close to the original estimate. Whether this company is a) too incompetent to factor in traffic conditions, b) too cheap to do anything but have it calculate "straight line distance divided by 80 mph", or simply c) too ignorant to realize that traffic conditions exist in the first place, what they're doing is LESS than useless. A broken gauge you don't bother looking at. A consistently malfunctioning gauge appears as if "maybe this time it'll be correct", but it never is.

5. You should be able to selectively DELETE ONE DESTINATION. This one can't. You have two options: delete every single location you've programmed, or delete nothing at all. This is just stupid.

6. The view shouldn't suddenly change. Initially, there was an "over the top of the car" view, as if you were sitting right on top of the car, seeing the streets come up. Then, about 2 weeks ago, it suddenly starts showing the view as if you're several hundred feet directly above the car. It looks awkward and makes for more difficult navigation. There is nothing on any of the menus on how to reset or fix this. It's not a question of zooming in or out. The original view is now gone.

7. It was advertised as "text to speech", which should mean it says something like "proceed 1.5 miles, and turn left on Wilshire Blvd." Instead it just says "turn left, then stay right, then turn left." Without identifying street names, there is ample chance of confusion when there are multiple possible turns in a short distance. It has given confusing and unclear directions even when I know where I'm going. I knew where to change lanes and turn because I'd done it before, not thanks to anything this piece of crap said.

Summary: this is a total piece of crap. There is nothing it does that is accurate or remotely useful. It's all either flat out wrong, largely inaccurate, or consistently misleading. If I could give it a negative rating, I would. A properly functioning GPS can be very useful, saving you from having to pore through maps while you drive. This one is no good at all. I'll let the shills from this company try to make excuses, but I've had enough of this nonsense. (November 16, 2008)




We have more similar products, listed by their category for you:


 




Intel's Core 2 Duo E6700 offers the best price-to-performance ratio we've seen in a desktop chip. For half the cost of AMD's top-of-the-line chip, you get identical if not superior performance and better power efficiency. AMD surprised us last year with its completely dominant dual-core chips, but Intel regains the crown with Core 2 Duo.

India expects to see rough diamond supplies fall by up to a fourth after the Diamond Trading Co (DTC), the distribution arm of De Beers, cuts down on Indian clients, an industry body said on Wednesday.


$21.99



Filmmaker Robert Zemeckis topped his breakaway hit Romancing the Stone with Back to the Future, a joyous comedy with a dazzling hook: what would it be like to meet your parents in their youth? Billed as a special-effects comedy, the imaginative film (the top box-office smash of 1985) has staying power because of the heart behind Zemeckis and Bob Gale's script. High schooler Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox, during the height of his TV success) is catapulted back to the '50s where he sees his parents in their teens, and accidentally changes the history of how Mom and Dad met. Filled with the humorous ideology of the '50s, filtered through the knowledge of the '80s (actor Ronald Reagan is president, ha!), the film comes off as a Twilight Zone episode written by Preston Sturges. Filled with memorable effects and two wonderfully off-key, perfectly cast performances: Christopher Lloyd as the crazy scientist who builds the time machine (a DeLorean luxury car) and Crispin Glover as Marty's geeky dad. --Doug Thomas

Critics and audiences didn't seem too happy with Back to the Future, Part II, the inventive, perhaps too clever sequel. Director Zemeckis and cast bent over backwards to add layers of time-travel complication, and while it surely exercises the brain it isn't necessarily funny in the same way that its predecessor was. It's well worth a visit, though, just to appreciate the imagination that went into it, particularly in a finale that has Marty watching his own actions from the first film. --Tom Keogh

Shot back-to-back with the second chapter in the trilogy, Back to the Future, Part III is less hectic than that film and has the same sweet spirit of the first, albeit in a whole new setting. This time, Marty ends up in the Old West of 1885, trying to prevent the death of mad scientist Christopher Lloyd at the hands of gunman Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen (Thomas F. Wilson, who had a recurring role as the bully Biff). Director Zemeckis successfully blends exciting special effects with the traditions of a Western and comes up with something original and fun. --Tom Keogh

$9.99



Set in a frontier world of bonnets and one-room schoolhouses, Love's Enduring Promise follows a headstrong young teacher named Missie (January Jones, Bandits), the daughter of Clark and Marty Davis (Dale Midkiff and Katherine Heigl) from previous prairie romance Love Comes Softly. After Clark injures himself in a woodcutting accident, the family farm is in danger of failing--until a handsome young stranger (Logan Bartholomew) helps out. Missie finds herself drawn to this man, but the intelligence and graciousness of young railroad magnate (Mackenzie Austin, How to Deal) appeals to a side of her that yearns to go beyond the hills and valleys of her childhood. What could be romantic froth becomes a quiet, well-paced, and thoughtful love story, thanks to a solid script, capable performances, and clean direction. Jones is particularly engaging; Missie could have been blandly virtuous, but Jones draws a rich and subtle range of emotions out of her scenes. Religious viewers will appreciate the movie's commitment to wholesome storytelling and clear moral perspective. Love's Enduring Promise, like Love Comes Softly, is based on a novel by Christian writer Janet Oke, though Love's Enduring Promise departs more from its source. --Bret Fetzer
$8.99



What sounds like the high-concept romantic comedy pitch from hell--widower president falls for smart lobbyist while the world watches--is actually intelligent, charming, touching, and quite funny. Granted, it's wish fulfillment all the way (when was the last time you saw a president who was truly presidential?), but in the capable hands of writer Aaron Sorkin (TV's Sports Night) and director Rob Reiner, The American President is incredibly enjoyable entertainment with quite a few ideas about both romance and the government. Michael Douglas stars as the president, who after three years in office starts thinking about the possibility of dating. When he auspiciously encounters cutthroat environmental lobbyist Sydney Ellen Wade (Annette Bening), sparks begin to crackle and the two begin a tentative but heartfelt romance. Of course, his job gets in the way--their first kiss is interrupted by a Libyan bombing--but darn it if these two kids aren't going to try and make it work! However, they hadn't counted on the president's Republican antagonist (Richard Dreyfuss), who starts carping about family values. The predictable plot--Douglas finally goes to bat for his lady and his country--is leavened by Sorkin's wonderful, snappy dialogue and a light touch from the usually subtle-as-a-sledgehammer Reiner. Both manage to create a believable White House-office atmosphere (with a crack staff including Martin Sheen, Michael J. Fox, Anna Deavere Smith, and Samantha Mathis) as well as a plausible and funny dating scenario. The true success of the movie, though, rides squarely on Douglas and Bening; this is unequivocally Douglas's best comedic performance (ergo his best performance, period) and Bening, usually such a good bad girl, takes a standard career-woman role and fleshes it out magnificently. You can see in an instant why Douglas would fall for her. One of the best unsung romantic comedies of the '90s. --Mark Englehart

by Marc Shapiro

Average customer rating: ISBN: 1550224670

by Amy; Parker, Sarah Jessica Sohn

Average customer rating: ISBN: 0752265059

by vogue

Average customer rating: ISBN: B000V81CGW
$10.99



The tagline emblazoned across the top of this latest WWF album's cover reads, "All New WWF Superstar Themes That Rock!" And on any compilation where songs by Limp Bizkit and Marilyn Manson are unremarkable for their fast pace and fury, it can be safely said that all of the songs do "rock!" Careful work has gone into matching songs to the performers, and the opportunity to listen to this album outside the context of WWF shows means that a fan can live the fantasy any time he chooses, all day long. Even Vince McMahon's theme strengthens the role he plays in the WWF's plot: Dope's "No Chance" talks in the first person about a stupidly angry boss, and connecting McMahon with this song is smart because everybody hates their boss on some level, and this song only reminds the listener of McMahon's part in the drama. Along with "No Chance," some of the other numbers on Forceable Entry are new covers or remixes of wrestlers' theme songs. Here, this generally means a new version with dirtier guitar work throughout it. This will only bother the listener if he was really attached to the original version of one of the themes, such as Chris Jericho's "Break the Walls Down" (Sevendust), or Undertaker's "Rollin'" (Limp Bizkit). Regardless, if you know the songs played upon the entrance of these wrestlers, then you know which themes you like and which ones you don't--and you know whether or not you need this album. --Mark Huntsman


System GPS 205 Nuvi Garmin
Shopping at www.gaunz.org  Created at Sat Nov 22 23:52:09 2008